#SONONYM SAMPLES MAC#It's a lot snappier and stable on my system (Windows) and the changelog specifically said it's much improved on Mac and Linux. so if I'm not getting highly correlated suggestions, then I'm just wasting time.It was just updated, check the changelog. Realistically, out of a million samples or so, there's maybe 100 I actually use. Still looking through to see if there's a sensible workflow for the half million or so still uncategorized samples I have where I have Sononym tag them, then use those tags to create folders, then use the folders in something like XO or Atlas. Unfortunately, it's not also a drum machine. Having played a bit with Sononym, I can say that Sononym is MUCH better at analysis than XO. It appears to be doing only a very basic pitch and length analysis. I have, for instance, loaded snare folders with a variety of samples of the same snare from the same drum machine, and it consistently thinks all kinds of other much less related snares are closer. I'm trying XO and sorely disappointed in the recommendations it makes. Makes sense now that I think it through, but I fail to see the overall benefit in using a 1 bar internal sequencer when creating DAW regions and moving them around like Legos seems much more intuitive. Apparently that was the issue with the "nudge" as I didn't realize it ONLY works if your'e using their internal sequencer. #SONONYM SAMPLES SOFTWARE#if you're using other sequencing software and just want to find samples to use in it, maybe Atlas will work better for you?I don't use the sequencer at all. If you use the latter a lot, stick to XO. XO came out later, looking like a copycat (although probably developed simultaneously), with a less comprehensive library system but a rather good sequencer built-in. Multiple libraries sometimes overlapping content. I have found Atlas (now on v2) to be easier and more useful for creating libraries of stuff and finding sounds for a project. If it is too resource intensive to be searching so many samples, is there a workaround like using Sononym to create new tags based on sonic properties, then creating subfolders based on those tags to feed into xo, or having xo only load samples with those tags? #SONONYM SAMPLES OFFLINE#Is there a way to do this in XO, Sononym, Cosmos, or any other such plugin? Do any have special features like the ability to auto-detect pitch then pitch-map across keyboard or transpose to a given note?Īny other reason I should be using one vs another? I'm a mac/logic user if it matters.Īlso: If something like XO is not only being used to do sample sorting as an offline or one time process, but is then also being used as the drum machine, is it taxing to the system that it has to generate and store a map of hundreds of thousands of samples? New M1 mac here with limited RAM, and already wary of any RAM hungry plugs. Unless the sample library software (xo, etc) is being used to then create new subfolders in the Mac Finder, then I'm not seeing how I can quickly audition the next related sound in another plugin. Watching XO tuts now, and it looks like it could just replace somthing like Battery as well, but I often want to use samples in MSoundFactory, Backbone, or other plugins that can manipulate the sounds in ways not possible within XO.Ĭurrently, I have my samples arranged in subfolders, so I can navigate to that subfolder within say MSoundFactory, then audition the samples in place with the click of a single button each time as the song plays. My understanding of all the new librarian tools like XO, Cosmos, and Sononym is that they analyze the sounds and help you group similar sounds. I still haven't categorized half of them, and I'd like to try something new. Snare sounds alone has maybe a dozen subfolders. I've taken huge amounts of time here and there trying to categorize them into subfolders. Like many producers, I have an absurd collection of drum samples.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |